Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- cashier:system-betting [2022/01/24 13:35] – mindaugas-bertys
+++ cashier:system-betting [2023/08/03 11:24] (current) – added banker bet section donata-vepstaite
@@ Line 76: / Line 76: @@
 {{ :cashier:retail_system_bet.gif?nolink |}}
+===== Banker bet =====
+{{ :cashier:banker_bets.png?200|}}
+When making a system bet there is also an option to place a banker bet combined with it.
+A banker bet is a fixed selection on which the total outcome of the betting slip will rely on. Including it in your bet slip can increase the likelihood of your overall bet being successful. However, if the banker bet fails, the entire combination will be lost, regardless of what happens in the other games.
+To clarify with an example, let's say you place a 3-selection accumulator bet with a banker:
+  * Selection 1 (Banker) - Team A to win (odds 1.5) - This selection fails.
+  * Selection 2 - Team B to win (odds 2.0) - This selection wins.
+  * Selection 3 - Team C to win (odds 1.8) - This selection wins.
+In this scenario, even though Selection 2 and Selection 3 in the accumulator have won, the entire accumulator bet is lost because the banker bet (Selection 1) has failed.
+In the opposite way, if only the banker bet would have won and the rest of the bets fails - the entire slip would still have failed.
+The only way for this kind of system bet to win is to meet both conditions: the banker bet should win both with the accumulator bet. For example:
+  * Selection 1 (Banker) - Team A to win (odds 1.5) - This selection wins.
+  * Selection 2 - Team B to win (odds 2.0) - This selection wins.
+  * Selection 3 - Team C to win (odds 1.8) - This selection fails.
+In this concrete scenario, if the banker bet wins and Selection 2 **or**/**and** Selection 3 wins - the bet wins.